Thursday, October 31, 2019
New Book Alert: Stories We Never Told By Sonia Yeorg; Psychological Drama Emphasizes The Horror of Gaslighting
New Book Alert: Stories We Never Told By Sonia Yeorg; Psychological Drama Emphasizes The Horror of Gaslighting
By Julie Sara Porter
Bookworm Reviews
Spoilers: Of the psychological manipulation tricks a person can play, one of the most frightening is probably gaslighting. The abuser does various things with the intent to drive the other person insane.
The term comes from the 1944 film Gaslight in which a wealthy man (Charles Boyer) manipulates his young wife (Ingrid Bergman) to the point of insanity.
The abuser will steal a small item and make the other person think they misplaced it or someone else stole it. They may deny a certain event, like a fight or a previous affair, happened and alter details so their victim questions their own memories. The abuser might also create clouds of paranoia and suspicion among the victim and friends and family so they feel isolated and can't trust anyone but the abuser.
What often results is a depressed anxious person who is so dependant on their abuser as their only link to sanity. They are right where the abuser wants them: a frightened paranoid mess that can't trust anyone.
Sonia Yeorg’s novel Stories We Never Told is about that. It is an intense psychological drama in which psychological mind games are used as revenge after a break up.
Dr. Jackie Sterlitz seemingly has a perfect life. She is a psychologist at a prestigious university and is involved in a plum research study to help autistic children. She is happily married to Miles, a sports talent scout, and while she doesn't have children, is making great strides in getting along with her stepson, Antonio, and earns the admiration of her graduate students and research assistants. Why she even has an ex-boyfriend, Harlan with whom even though they parted ways are amicable friends and colleagues in the same Department of Psychology.
Things are great until the night when Harlan invites Jackie and Miles on a double date at a swank upscale restaurant and bring his date: a younger woman and not just any younger woman but Jackie's graduate student, Nasira Amari.
This encounter puts Jackie in a whirl and she becomes jealous. How could Harlan choose a younger woman, practically a naive girl like Nasira over her? They now do things like vacation in places that Harlan and Jackie dreamt about but never had time to visit or go places that Harlan was never interested in visiting before.
Jackie becomes suspicious and asks impertinent questions to Nasira about her love life and whether she knew that she and Harlan were a couple before. She also spies on Harlan and Nasira following them at home and watch them enter and exit Harlan's house.
Yeorg is very subtle in pulling the Readers’ sympathies. First, they side with Harlan thinking Jackie is unbalanced and needs to let go of her relationship. We think that she's unstable and are prepared for the book to go into full Fatal Attraction territory. Until we get into Harlan's point of view.
Harlan's perspective shows him as the unstable one who has a hard time letting go. He brags that he seduced Nasira and brought her to the restaurant just to gauge Jackie's reaction. He reveals that he wants to get revenge on Jackie for breaking up with him.
Harlan uses various means at his disposal to manipulate Jackie. Jackie's following him and Nasira is called into question as he fills Nasira with suspicion that Jackie is unstable with the intent of creating a hostile workplace. Jackie also discovers that the data on her research has been compromised leading her to suspect Nasira.
Jackie also finds reasons to doubt her marriage to Miles. Harlan mentions games that he claims that Jackie was invited to but forgot about. He hints that Miles is up to something whenever he is gone leaving her to doubt his fidelity as he has suspicions about hers. Even Miles’ formerly addicted son plays into Harlan's hand when he is alone with the troubled boy causing him to doubt his father and stepmother.
Harlan is a master manipulator. He is similar to those characters in old Hollywood suspense films like Boyer in Gaslight, Sydney Greenstreet in The Maltese Falcon, or Ray Milland in Dial M for Murder, a sophisticated sociopath who observes others’ behaviors while he takes part in host-like activities and engages in polite conversation.
It's no coincidence that his research study on how people behave when they are lying. He is able to use his research to find the tells that those around him are hiding.
Harlan observes so he can find and play onto their weaknesses like Miles’ confusion about former relationship or Antonio's addiction.
Jackie in particular is susceptible because he knows her so well. He uses her insecurities about their former relationship and her career as springboards for his gaslighting towards her.
Jackie unintentionally provides him with the opportunity because of her earlier suspicious behavior towards him and Nasira. Harlan is able to tell Nasira or Miles, “See how she followed me before? Isn't that suspicious? Clearly you can't trust her!” While Jackie's earlier behavior gives Harlan the key, it is based on an emotional knee jerk reaction and ends just as quickly as it began. Harlan is slower, more methodical, and based on a cold reasonable drive to control. Jackie may accidentally hurt someone and regret it later, but Harlan would give someone a slow moving poison just to test the results.
Harlan's strength is in manipulation so Jackie is only beholden to him until she breaks herself from his mind games. It becomes a victory when she begins to piece his lies together and find her way out of them.
New Book Alert: The Road Between: Love is Eternal by Stacy Keenan; Vampire Love Story Emphasizes Romance Over Horror
New Book Alert: The Road Between: Love is Eternal by Stacy Keenan; Vampire Love Story Emphasizes Romance Over Horror
By Julie Sara Porter
Bookworm Reviews
Spoilers: Okay stop me if you heard this one: A young mortal woman meets and falls in love with a wealthy stranger who is handsome, but prone to strange habits and sometimes seems sinister. It doesn't take long before the woman discovers-surprise!- Tall, Dark, and Handsome is actually a vampire!
You can't read Stacy Keenan's vampire-mortal romance novel The Road Between, without thinking of that other vampire-mortal romance novel series by Stephanie Meyer. But what sets it apart from that other series and makes it better is the emphasis more on the romance than in the supernatural.
The other thing that improves on other narratives in the genre is the sheer likeability of the characters. This isn't a creepy abusive relationship disguised as teenage wish fulfillment. Instead, it's a romantic comedy with a cute charming couple and one of the pair just so happens to be a vampire.
Abby Wickes lives for monsters. She works in her dream job as a designer and illustrator of horror posters, masks, DVD packaging, toys, and other memorabilia for horror movies. She watches and can quote her favorite monster movies verbatim. Halloween is her favorite holiday and she and her aunt go all out decorating the house, passing out trick or treat candy, and participating in community Halloween events like the town carnival. This year, Aunt Sarah will be out of town so Abby is determined to uphold the hallowed Halloween family tradition.
While working on her aunt's farm and planning for the Halloween festivities, she encounters Nathan Davenport, a handsome neighbor who is from an old established family in the neighborhood. That's strange, Aunt Sarah says. There hasn't been any Davenports in town for over one hundred years. No matter. Nathan is good looking, sweet, and open to anything that Abby suggests so a romance develops.
There are several cute scenes of the two dating and getting to know each other more reminiscent of a romance than a horror or dark fantasy. Many of their most mundane moments such as feeding the horses or decorating the house are filled with sweet dialogue between the two. He compliments her decorating talents and listens amusingly to her tirades about her favorite movies like the Interview with a Vampire. Nathan shows Abby his work as a violin maker and his home in which he is the last in a long line.
This isn't an Edward who is obsessed with his Bella and trying to shape her to fit his desires. Instead this is a man who accepts his girlfriend's interests and acquiesces to them as she does to him. It is a relationship of equal partners instead of domination.
Keenan plays on the Vampire Mythos rather well by making light of many of the common traits of the lore. While Nathan can be photographed, his face is faded and looks fuzzy which fools Abby at first thinking that it's a bad picture. He can go out during the day obviously just gets a really bad sunburn. (He also emphatically does not sparkle!) Yes getting a stake through the heart would kill a vampire, but wouldn't a stab through the heart kill anybody? There are some really clever conversations as Abby mentions all of the things she learned from horror movies and literature and Nathan challenges each and every one.
Which leads to a pretty big plothole that since Abby is so genre savvy and knowledgeable about horror movies, why it takes her until near the end of the book to put two and two together and realize that he is a vampire. On the other hand, it could be chalked up to Nathan not acting or exhibiting any of the traits that most fictional vampires do that causes Abby to disregard his identity.
There are some pretty sinister characters that Abby and Nathan encounter and the book takes a 360 degree turn from a gentle romance to the usual dark fantasy. But this is a cute book about a charming couple both living and undead.
Saturday, October 19, 2019
New Book Alert: The Screaming Skull (The Chronicles of Elberon Vol. 1) by Rick Ferguson; Brilliantly Funny Parody of the Epic Fantasy Genre
New Book Alert: The Screaming Skull (The Chronicles of Elberon Vol. 1) by Rick Ferguson; Brilliantly Funny Parody of the Epic Fantasy Genre
By Julie Sara Porter
Bookworm Reviews
If you read a lot of epic fantasies, you could do worse than reading Rick Ferguson's The Chronicles of Elberon. Of course if you were looking to read a serious epic fantasy, you could do a lot better. But if you are in the mood for a parody of the genre which mines the various standard characters and tropes for all their humorous worth, then this is definitely the right choice.
King Elberon, Lord of the Tradewind Isles, Defender of the Faith, President of the Southern Shield, High Admiral of the Seven Fleets, Protector of the Iron Coast, and Friend of the Dolphins is in despair. It is his birthday and he learns from a soothsayer that he will die at age 130 years old sitting on the toilet. Not exactly the heroic going out in a blaze- of-glory-warrior-death that any sword- wielding-Odin-worshipping King and Fighter dreams about but the next news is even worse. Lithaine, an elf and Elberon’s former friend and companion has an army and is heading straight for Elberon to kill him. With regret and remembering that he invited all of his other former companions to the party with the intent to kill them, Elberon decides to document his life.
From the moment that he stole a magical girdle which gave super strength and challenged his warlord father for his independence, Elberon's life has been one adventure after another. Along the way, he meets various allies all of which come from your standard fantasy series and are his True Companions. There is the aforementioned Lithaine, who looks like your typical handsome graceful romantic elf, but has a foul mouth and a sardonic sense of humor. Redulfo, a wizard who absorbed a dark spirit and therefore his status changed from Balanced Good to Disciplined Evil. Amabored, a warrior attached to his sword, Stormcrow and whom Elberon describes as “the most bloodthirsty son of a bitch (he) has ever met.” Malcolm, a paladin Lindar, a half elf, Androgen, a dwarf, and James, a ranger round out the team making the typical crew of humans, elves, wizards, and dwarves that can be found in these works.
Of course Our Heroes have to take on magical quests and face villains that are found in these works everything from dark wizards, to corrupt kings and warlords, to more dragons and monsters than you can wave Wun Wun, the Game of Thrones giant at.
Naturally, the adventurers also find love and with many of his journies, Elberon recalls the many mistresses and lovers that he had along the way. Two are the most important. Melinda, a thief who later becomes head of the Thieve's Guild assists Elberon a number of times before the two become lovers. Another woman in Elberon's adventurous past is Cassiopeia, a nubile warrior cleric priestess who becomes one of Elberon's True Companions as well as his lover. Among Elberon's many many regrets is stringing the two women along at the same time and jeopardizing their lives as well as his love for them and vice versa.
This book is a treat for any Fantasy lovers. It is littered with references that even the newest of fans of the genre will get. Elberon and co. Are constantly worried about gaining or losing Strength, Magic, Healing, or Luck points like players of a certain well known RPG game from the ‘80’s. To further add to the joke, there is a character called Gygax named in honor of Dungeons and Dragons creator Gary Gygax. Minor and supporting characters are rich with names like Sir Michael of Moorcock and Sir Jethro of Tull.
One of the more hilarious moments comes when during a dream, Elberon encounters a wise character called Joseph Ki-Rin who informs Elberon that he is taking The Hero's Journey as defined by Joseph Campbell's book, Hero with a Thousand Faces. He calls the various steps that Elberon like meeting the wise mentor-Joseph Ki-Rin-, descend into the underworld, confront his anima, and encountering his feminine side. When Elberon is confused, Joseph Ki-Rin tells him that he is following the step of Refusing the Call.
Ferguson clearly knows his fantasy works by allowing his characters to follow the various fantasy tropes while commenting on them. Elberon asks the Reader point blank if his adventures sound too much like Tolkien. Well he points out Tolkien was the translator of the Red Book of West March and not the author so how could you rip off history and Tolkien mostly cribbed his work from Celtic and Norse mythology anyway.
As for how Elberon, a fantasy character in a Medieval-esque land knows so much about Tolkien and how he can throw phrases like “pre-industrial” around and make references to Star Wars. Well, there is a reason for that and it is one of the cleverest running gags in the book. His world, Woerth is actually one of several alternate universes. He and the other people of Woerth are familiar with the various Earths and have borrowed facets of their history and culture including worshipping various deities. Characters have even been found in the various Earths. One of their dark wizards actually can be found by different familiar names in the other Earths-Voldemort, Saruman, Vladimir Putin-you know all the evil dark wizards.
Despite the humor, there is a sense of melancholy throughout the book that keeps The Chronicles of Elberon from being a series that is just joke after joke. Elberon is a character who knows his better days are behind him. He is like the former-hero-turned-outcast who looks on his glory days once hard as the best days of his life. He also looks back with deep sadness with the mistakes he made particularly with Melinda and Cassiopeia and in despair over the things that he learned and wished that he hadn't like many of his quests were orchestrated by a deeper conspiracy.
Even though he is king with untold wealth and power, and is married and has heirs, Elberon cannot connect with his present life because he is living in the past.
The first book in the Chronicles of Elberon is a brilliant book when it deconstructs the various fantasy elements, but sometimes it runs away with itself. There is no straight linear passage of time. Instead Elberon jumps from one adventure and goes to another one and then back to the present, then to a third adventure before going back to the first one. Several plots mix together so it's hard to tell when any of them take place. Elberon for example may casually mention a character died. Then after several quests involving the character only remember several chapters later to tell us how they died. The Reader has to really pay attention to the timeline (which thankfully Ferguson supplies us with one at the end of the book.)
In a way, the choice in narration makes sense. The book is written as though Elberon is chronicling his adventures to a scribe. So he is telling his story the way most people would when they talk about something that happened in their lives, then back track to an earlier event remembering some important detail that they left out. It could also be mocking the whole en media res storytelling device found in epic tales in which adventures often began in the middle of the action rather than at the chronological beginning. Either way it doesn't make it easy to read and if I were Elberon's scribe, I would throw down my quill in despair wondering how many pages that I have to blot out and redo.
The Chronicles of Elberon is a fun series that makes fun of Fantasy but it is clearly that it is also an homage abs tribute. Rick Ferguson wrote a love letter to the genre, a very silly, satiric and at times confusing love letter, but a love letter nonetheless.
New Book Alert: 8 Seconds to Midnight (Commander John Hart Series) by John Leifer; Winning Political Thriller With Strong Plot and Memorable Characters on Both Sides
New Book Alert: 8 Seconds to Midnight (Commander John Hart Series) by John Leifer; Winning Political Thriller With Strong Plot and Memorable Characters on Both Sides
By Julie Sara Porter
Bookworm Reviews
By Julie Sara Porter
Bookworm Reviews
8 Seconds to Midnight by John Leifer is very similar to one of those political thriller movies where the bad guys make a threat to use a weapon to cause destruction and the good guys try to prevent that from happening.
But it is much better than the standard one-dimensional action film repertoire.
Instead, 8 Seconds to Midnight has some strong tense moments of plot and action, but it plays more like a chess game in which two sides of memorable characters scheme against each other to either cause or stop the deaths of countless lives.
In the previous book, CIA’s counter terrorism expert Commander John Hart tried to stop biological weapons that were set to go off in major airports. He succeeded and the virus was eliminated but still 85,000 Americans died.
In this one, the United Islamic State terrorism organization led by the sinister Ibraham al-Bakr plan to steal a nuclear device from the Pakistani government. To do that, al-Bakr has to recruit allies such as General Malik, who has been disgraced because of his involvement with the biological weapon in the previous book. Malik is commanded to provide al-Bakr with the information and assistance to pull the theft of the device off.
Meanwhile, Hart and his colleagues are concerned about silence on the networks. They usually hear some chatter, but no news is definitely not good news. That usually means something is happening. Their worst concerns are proven correct when they hear of the theft of the device. Now it's a race between the United Islamic State to steal and arm the device and Hart's team to stop it before it goes off.
There are some great moments of suspense concerning the two camps. The theft of the device takes quite a few chapters, but it is filled with suspenseful moments where al-Bakr assembles his team using blackmail, threats, and their misguided sense of revenge, money, or protectiveness for their families to his advantage.
Things get pretty tense when they arrive at the base and have to go through various checkpoints to get to the device. The suspense is particularly felt within the character of Major Barr, a soldier coerced into siding with the terrorists. His character is scrutinized expertly as several times, he finds an opportunity in which he could alert authorities or shoot the terrorists himself but does not. This internal dialogue reveals how a person can be torn between their actions and conscience.
The means in which the terrorists act are repellant, but interesting from a storytelling point as they use various methods at their disposal to achieve their goal including obtaining recruits from around the world. Three sleeper agents are recruited in America to use their expertise in physics and metallurgy to put the bomb together and send it on its way to where it could do the most damage.
Another agent that is solicited is Sarah Quaisrani, AKA, “The Arctic Fox” so called because she lives in seclusion in the snowy landscape of Canada and because of her equally cold-blooded nature. She harbors no allegiance to Allah, al-Bakr, or to anyone else but herself. However, she carries herself with an icy clever detachment as she delivers the bomb to New York City and puts local and Federal law enforcement on a wild goose chase involving various disguises and doubles.
Hart's chapters are also filled with unbelievable tension and suspense as his team try to catch up with al-Bakr's. Many times he has to rely on testimony from allies and relatives of the terrorists to obtain information.
In one chapter he and Niya Jamali, a female spy appeal to the sympathies of Malik's daughter, Ayesha Naru, a doctor who has treated various war victims. They remind her that many people, children especially, will die if she doesn't tell them about her father's whereabouts and allegiances.
What sets this book apart from many others in the genre is the care that Leifer gives to writing not only the protagonists but the antagonists as well. Hart is a fully developed character with some traumatic regrets in his life such as the death of his brother as a child and failed missions that propel him to do his duty. He has some sweet moments with his fiancée, Liz Wilkins, a doctor with the CDC who is just as dedicated to her profession as Hart is to his.
Hart also has a strong moral compass which acknowledges wrongdoing even when it's done by his country. When Ayesha comments on the death toll that were direct and indirect results of the United States, Hart has no answer for her except to try to prevent more of them.
Even some of his interrogation methods such as threats and abuse are similar to the people that he is fighting against suggesting that in such conflict, the sides aren't really that different from each other. The motives might be different, to take or spare countless lives, but the means to get there may be more similar than most people think.
Leifer also shows his gift for writing in how he writes the antagonists. Instead of being cardboard villains, they are well defined by their motivations to join the United Islamic State. Some are drawn by a strict religious upbringing. Others out of revenge for the deaths of family members. Others simply for financial gain or for power. Their decisions to take part in such violence are made clear and are not glossed over.
To find out how an enemy organization works, one must discover why they work. Why would people join such a group? What motivates them to take part in such violence? Liefer shows that with the personalization of the various terrorists. The Reader is not meant to necessarily agree with them, but to understand who they are and why they choose such a life that guarantees death.
Leifer also achieves a feat not found in such books and movies. With many action stories, there is a realization that countless lives could be lost. But that thought is not seriously dealt with. Not so in this book. No matter what move Hart and his colleagues make, deaths are bound to happen. Even when an action results in a lesser tragedy, they are still made aware of the destruction and loss of life, that while less than expected is still way too many.
8 Seconds to Midnight is that rare kind of thriller that has plenty of action, but isn't just content to give us that. Instead the behaviors of the characters on both sides propel the action making the Readers think while they enjoy the ride.
Weekly Reader Thursday Next Edition: The Woman Who Died A Lot (Thursday Next Series Vol. VII) by Jasper Fforde; Average Ending To An Otherwise Stellar Series
Weekly Reader Thursday Next Edition: The Woman Who Died A Lot (Thursday Next Series Vol. VII) by Jasper Fforde; Average Ending To An Otherwise Stellar Series
By Julie Sara Porter
Bookworm Reviews
Spoilers: So this is it.
We finally come to the end of The Thursday Next Series with the Woman Who Died A Lot. I must say that I haven't read a more disappointing final book to a series since well the last time I reviewed an entire series for this blog!
In the previous book One of Our Thursdays is Missing, Jasper Fforde stretched his imagination to the nth degree by throwing so many concepts and characters to the wall to see what stuck. While the plot was hard to follow, at least the creativity behind a novel set entirely in Book World and narrated by the written version of Thursday Next couldn't be ignored.
This time Fforde does the exact opposite: gives us a plot but doesn't do much in the realm of imagination and creativity. That makes this book somehow lackluster and anemic compared to the other volumes in the series.
It's not interesting that Thursday has been demoted as head of SpecsOps LiteraTech division for a younger rival/fan girl of hers. The plot line of the old veteran vs. the young upstart has been done to death and unfortunately Fforde does little with it except have Thursday act snippy and sarcastic to the new chief, Phoebe Smalls.
Thursday's animosity towards the sinister Goliath Corporation is a regular theme throughout the series and in the past Goliath has pulled some shady schemes and dealings that even the most hardline CEO would step back. But here Goliath is little more than a mere presence with its representatives making threats, searching for antique volumes, and getting rich off of other's suffering. In other words they went from being a clever satire of corrupt corporations to being just a corrupt corporation.
And please no more of the “Parent vs.Teenage Children” conflict. We did not come here to read about Thursday's daughter, Tuesday's boyfriend troubles or her son, Friday's rivalry with a classmate who is also Tuesday's boyfriend. We came here for clever literary sendups, brilliant wordplay, and to read about Thursday cleverly outsmarting her antagonists. Instead Fforde treats his characters like a tongue-in-cheek rerun of Modern Family.
Speaking of literary sendups. In what amounted to the book’s finale, Fforde committed the biggest sin of all: Book World is nowhere to be found! Thursday does not visit nor do any of the characters, many of whom are her closest friends, communicate with her. This explanation is hand waved by saying Thursday suffered a head injury in the previous book that prevents her from visiting Book World. So its characters are reduced to only one Wingco, an RAF pilot clearly based on Commander Biggles who is trying to find his way into the world of Dark Reading Matter, in which characters float along in imagination before they are put to paper. Other than that,Thursday doesn't visit abd barely talks about her Book World friends like Col. and Melanie Bradshaw, Jane and Edward Rochester, Emperor Zhark, Written Thursday, or the Cat formerly known as Cheshire.
No no no! The Thursday Next Series is supposed to be the literary equivalent of Who Framed Roger Rabbit and Wreck It Ralph!
Depriving Thursday of that setting which was so integral to the other volumes is like Eddie Valiant being unable to visit Toon Town, Ralph locked inside his game and not being allowed to see into other games, or depriving Special Agent Dale Cooper of Twin Peaks. The setting is so brilliant and unique and the protagonist is such a strong part of that brilliant uniqueness. They belong to that world and the world belongs to them. To lose that world is losing what made the series so great in the first place.
Part of the fun of the series has always been the literary references and cameos and the relationship between a book, the author, and the reader. It's an almost symbiotic relationship in which the author creates the world, the book inhabits the world, and the reader imagines the world. Fforde understood this.
He understood that each book that is written has its own tiny universe and the Reader is the spark that brings it to life. Here that ideal is lost to a plot that pays little tribute to that relationship and is instead a paint-by-numbers action storyline.
The book isn't all bad however. There are some great touches and when the book focuses on them, it's pretty decent. Thursday accepts the job as Chief Librarian of Swindon's Fatsos-All-You-Can-Eat-Drinks-Not-Included Library. It’s hardly the standard quiet public library with story hours, computer labs, and knitting classes, as the assault rifle that Thursday packs every morning can attest. Instead, this is a library in which patrons would literally kill for the latest volume and staff are licensed to keep the peace by any means necessary. This concept cleverly calls back to The Eyre Affair as we learned that people take art and literature so seriously that they shed blood over it. In fact, the SpecOps organizations have specific divisions that deal with art and literature crimes. So it makes sense that librarians would be armed to the teeth against patrons who violently argue whether Francis Bacon wrote Shakespeare's plays, are driven to make Enid Blyton's England into a reality, or take their hatred or love for romance novelist Daphne Farquitt to disturbing levels.
The title comes from the fact that Goliath keeps sending synthetics to replace Thursday. Thursday and her husband, Landen have become so used to it that they create code phrases so Landen knows if the Thursday knows he is talking to his wife. If she doesn't respond, Landen calls Spec Ops and the synthetic is removed. Some of the chapters are even cleverly told from the point of view of the Synthetic Thursdays so the Reader has to be on guard for a sudden change in narrator.
There is also some Pythonesque brilliance as Swindon prepares for a Smiting from the Supreme Deity. Prophecies predict that it will be happening the following Monday at 12 PM on the button. (Hmm, I never knew that prophecies were that specific. Well except Agnes Nutter’s.) So the citizens do everything that they can to prevent it or at least to divert it so less people get hurt. Everything from creating a Smite Shield to finding a righteous man to stand in the middle of a group of sinners so the Supreme Deity would be unable to strike one of their own followers.
Once you get past the tedious angsty parent and teenage arguments, Tuesday and Friday are actually well written. Tuesday is a young genius who is instrumental in creating the Smiting Shield and studies Dark Reading Matter. Friday is a more action oriented character who is trying to fight a destiny as someone who will murder a classmate and cause a chain reaction that could bring about the end of the Universe (provided the Smiting isn't successful of course).
In fact it's very possible that Fforde could later write a spin off series that star the daring Friday alongside the cerebral Tuesday as a crime fighting/time traveling duo.
With Friday's storyline, Fforde opens up the theme that actions have consequences and that even when some intentions are good, they can still lead to problems later. Through much of the series, the Chronoguard has been seen as antagonists who are secretive, malicious, and commit terrible actions such as going back in time and erasing enemies from existence like Thursday's father and temporarily her husband, Landen.
In First Among Sequels, Friday manages to alter the time stream so that Chronoguard was never created.
They aren't able to mess with time and exiles are returned. In a show of the Chronoguard 's diminished role, Thursday's father who was a strong presence in the first four books is relegated in the later books to mere cameos as the stereotypical befuddled retiree. (His role as the eccentric destiny-spewing time traveler is taken over by his grandson, Friday.)
While getting rid of the Chronoguard removes the world of one pest, unfortunately leaving Goliath behind, this book reveals the unintended consequences of such an action. Several people no longer will achieve brilliance in a career in time travel in which they visited and studied different time periods, changed history,saved the future, committed many heroic acts, and were promoted for their efforts. Instead, there are many young people who were once promising time travelers and whose futures are now reduced to working in unsatisfactory minimum wage jobs and settling into unhappy marriages, piles of debt, and general languidness before dying of natural causes. The worst part is these former future Chronoguard members receive Letters of Destiny and on some level retain memories of their once exciting illustrious careers in which they achieved greatness. Now they are stuck in a meaningless existence despairing a destiny that they remember but now can never have.
Another dramatic subplot is that of Jenny, the third child of the Park-Laine-Next family or rather the nonexistent daughter of the Park-Laine-Next family. She is actually a false memory implanted by Aornis Hades, supervillain Acheron Hades' bitch of a sister, a mnemenomorph who specializes in confusing her antagonists with false memories.
It is heartbreaking as Thursday and the other family members are filled with memories of an adorable little girl and bratty kid sister and they have to be reminded constantly that no she is not at a friend's house or at school, she isn't real. Aornis gets a sadistic laugh out of watching the family remember Jenny, wonder where she is, and are anguished when they are told she doesn't exist. Aornis rubs further salt into the gaping wound by removing their memories of the revelation so they remember Jenny and have to be told the truth again and again.
The Jenny subplot carries over into the final three Thursday Next books. Unfortunately, it is resolved in a ridiculously deus ex machina fashion in which a new character suddenly arrives and provides the solution with no real resolution to the character's identity, or reason for why this character exists or why she helped the Next family. There are a couple of theories but they are never outright stated so they just remain theories.
In fact deus ex machina is one of the more annoying tropes that appears in this book. In the final pages, one villain who had been present since The Eyre Affair is removed in the most ridiculously over the top fashion. In a book deprived of the imagination from the previous volumes, the villain's death lacks in originality. It's like you read about a character building up for six books for a climactic battle that never happens in book seven. It's out of nowhere and derivative. I feel like instead of giving his series a great send off, Jasper Fforde just wanted it to end.
However, the problems with The Woman Who Died A Lot should not distract from what a wonderful series The Thursday Next series in general. Even their worst books are still great in terms of originality and quality. As a whole, the series is brilliant, imaginative, original and is cleverly written and brilliantly characterized. That's why The Thursday Next Series is among the greatest book series of all time.
Weekly Reader Philippa Gregory Edition: Three Sisters, Three Queens (The Plantagenet and Tudor Court Series Vol. VIII) by Philippa Gregory; Sisterly Competitiveness Reaches It's Zenith Between King Henry VIII's Wife and Sisters
Weekly Reader Philippa Gregory Edition: Three Sisters, Three Queens (The Plantagenet and Tudor Court Series Vol. VIII) by Philippa Gregory; Sisterly Competitiveness Reaches It's Zenith Between King Henry VIII's Wife and Sisters
By Julie Sara Porter
Bookworm Reviews
Spoilers: Many of the Plantagenet and Tudor Court Series books have an ongoing theme of sisterhood by blood or friendship, and for better or worse. Quite a few of the books deal with the jealousy and competitiveness that sisters share. When those sisters are members of a Royal family, that competitiveness can be very public, costly, and catastrophic.
The eighth volume of the series focuses on Margaret Tudor, second child of King Henry VII and Elizabeth of York and older sister of King Henry VIII. Her lot in life has always been to be the second and overlooked in any situation. She is not in the line of succession because she is a girl so she is not held in as high regard as her brothers, Princes Arthur and Henry. She is not thought of as a great beauty like her younger sister Princess Mary so she is not a serious contender for marriage. When Arthur marries Katherine of Aragon, all eyes and eventual power go to the new arrival from Spain so Margaret is overlooked in her own country.
It's no wonder that she looks forward to her arranged marriage to King James IV of Scotland. She may not know the country that well and it won't be a match made for love but at least she will be the most important woman in her own country.
When the book begins, Margaret is not a pleasant person. While many of the books in the series begin with the protagonists as children, they show a level of maturity that is to be expected of a preteen-teenager of that period. Here Margaret acts like a shrieking vain spoiled brat. She constantly judges Katherine for her clothes, piety, and accent even though she can't help but inwardly admire her composure and how she carries herself as a queen. She also constantly craves attention to the point of demanding it.
It is understandable, given her situation as the unfavorite in the family but it still is annoying to read.
After the difficulties that her predecessors suffer from political intrigue, child marriages, and warfare at young ages, Margaret Tudor is the first chronological Royal in the series that actually behaves like an Entitled Royal Pain.
Thankfully, she doesn't stay that way and the book is just as much about Margaret's path to maturity as it is about her carving her own destiny from underneath her sister's shadows.
After she marries James, she is bemused by his abrasive brusque nature and his freer sexuality. Part of that sexuality is to not only openly admit his various love affairs but to accept his illegitimate children into her household. While Margaret is aware of royal extramarital affairs and knows that male royals often have mistresses, she won't have that at her house. She orders James’ illegitimate children out of the castle and back with their mothers or other relatives. James grumbles but willingly accepts. Margaret for once is not content to play second fiddle to anyone and commands that at least as far as Scotland and her marriage bed are concerned, she comes first.
James and Margaret get through that first hurdle fairly well and settle into a fairly happy ultimately loving marriage in which they have two sons and one daughter. Though one son and the daughter die in infancy, Margaret's third son, James survives to become the heir. Just when Margaret and James are contemplating a bright future, King Henry VIII declares war on France and as part of the Auld Alliance, Scotland has to assist France. So James is called to lead the troops and Margaret is declared regent in front of a council of very suspicious old school male nobles who are none too keen about being led by a woman.
Remember how one of Philippa Gregory's strengths in this series is in telling multiple viewpoints of the same events? Well she brings that in full force in this book. What in The Constant Princess was a military triumph for Katherine of Aragon to show her strength and leadership becomes a moment of agony for Margaret Tudor. When English troops kill James, bury him in England, and send his bloody coat to Henry as proof, Margaret is in anguish and is filled with hatred at the smug English queen who caused this. Her rivalry with Katherine turns to grief and hatred.
It is fascinating how Katherine of Aragon transforms from a feisty spiritual warrior in her book to a bloodthirsty villain in Margaret's. That's the true talent in Gregory's book how a savior in one book turns into a terror in another.
Now Margaret has to rule by herself while privately mourning for the husband that she had grown to love. Her widowhood and rule is made more difficult by her council who challenge her every rule, don't care for how she tries to make peace between the feuding clans, and consider the official male regent the Earl of Albany a better potential ruler. However despite the stumbling blocks, Margaret is able to use her leadership skills and forceful nature to make things happen.
One development that occurs because of the war is the importance of Princess Mary’s love life. Suddenly the young unmarried English princess and the recently widowed Scottish queen are debating potential partners. Okay, the King of France Louis XII is old enough to be their grandfather but he has wealth, power, and whichever sister he marries will be in charge of one country or in Margaret's case two. Margaret's claim on Louis ends however when the King sets his interest on the younger more beautiful Mary.
While the title of the book is Three Sisters, Three Queens, Mary probably gets the least amount of development in this book. Most of her story is told through letters to Margaret.
In these letters and in Margaret's recollections, Mary is childish, vapid, and more concerned with fashionable gowns, romance, and looking pretty. As we saw earlier Margaret was the same way, but she goes through a lot of growth and development in her book. Mary however does not.
Mary marries Louis for the financial benefits and to be taken care of even though she has a lover, Charles Brandon waiting in the wings. She doesn't care about ruling, she just wants to be admired and appraised because of her appearance and sunny disposition. Mary's extreme vanity is made apparent after Louis dies and she immediately leaves for England with Charles Brandon and marries him. This sudden marriage incense Harry and Katherine to the point that they estrange from Mary and Charles. It takes a papal dispensation before they forgive the duo.
They are ultimately forgiven, and their money is restored. Charles is accepted into Henry's inner circle despite having no interest in politics, religion, or the monarchy. He is solely seen as merely a charming courtier and Mary is seen as a pretty ornament in the castle. They contribute nothing but good looks and amiable companionship and that is a-okay with them.
Mary's two marriages and her closeness with Katherine, the woman whom Margaret blames for her husband's death reignites her rivalry with them. This causes Margaret to make the most reckless decision of her rulership: to fall in love with and marry Archibald Douglas, the 6th Earl of Angus.
Douglas is at first a supportive courtier, listening to Margaret's troubles and opens up her passionate desires. The first sign that all is suspicious is at their wedding when Douglas tells her that he doesn't have a ring so she supplies him with one. This little moment establishes his character as a moocher and freeloader who abuses his wife's trust for his own benefit.
Douglas does show some positive characteristics however. When the Earl of Albany displaces Margaret and her son James in a coup, Douglas does some quick thinking such as feigning loyalty to her anatgonists to ensure her safety and survival. When Margaret complains about Mary and Katherine again, Douglas brutally sets her straight by reminding her that this fight isn't just about her rivalry with the two women, this is about their kingdoms and she just really needs to shut up about them.
However, Douglas's bad qualities outweigh his good and this becomes noticeable in their marriage. Douglas convinces Margaret to favor his family members causing the clan rivalries to come into focus again undoing the work that she and her late husband,James did to bring those rivalries to an end. Margaret is so blinded by her attraction to Douglas, that she gives him whatever he wants and he slowly gains power through his wife.
During the coup, Margaret is left isolated and dependent on Douglas, even removed from her son. She is forced to appeal to her brother for assistance. While she is in exile, Douglas seizes her throne and shacks up with a mistress that he was once betrothed to.
Historically, Margaret Tudor was the grandmother of Mary Queen of Scots and the parallels are evident. Both had an arranged first marriage that ended with the death of their husbands. Both had unwise second marriages to opportunists who used their marriages as platforms for their own gain. Both had third marriages but ended up exiled from Scotland and separated from the throne and their sons.
However, what separates grandmother and granddaughter is the end results of their exile. Mary Queen of Scots was imprisoned while in England and spent much of her time in captivity and becoming the center of various plots and conspiracies. Ultimately, Queen Elizabeth signed her death warrant and she was executed.
Margaret however takes a different tactic becoming a bolder character by taking control of her life. She divorces Douglas. Despite objections from Douglas, the council, and her family Margaret fully intends to see the divorce through. It becomes particularly hypocritical when Henry insists that “marriage is ordained by God” you know despite his various lovers and him wanting to separate from his own lawfully wedded wife. This hypocrisy makes Margaret even more determined to divorce Douglas. She declares that she will never again “believe that rules should be separate between men and women.”
Margaret manages to divorce Douglas and get him exiled. She falls in love for a third time with Henry Stewart, 1st Earl of Methvan whom she marries. The books ends things on a happy third marriage though in reality, Margaret's third marriage was just as stressful and she separated from him as well.
However, Margaret does create a lasting legacy for her son when King James V is settled into his throne. Margaret becomes instrumental in restoring peace between England and Scotland and arranges her son’s marriage to the French princess, Marie of Guise.
Margaret reaches the end of her book sympathizing with Katherine who is cast aside for Anne Boleyn and Mary who is estranged from her brother when she supports Katherine. Mary also reveals in her final letter to her sister that her looks have faded, and that she is ill and dying.
Margaret realizes that in the three-way competition between the three sisters, Margaret's the only one that came out on top. However, it's a hollow victory as she sincerely mourns how low her sisters have fallen and that instead of enemies and rivals, they could have been friends.
Three Sisters, Three Queens develops Margaret Tudor into a memorable character that can be spoiled, jealous, headstrong, but also forceful, determined, and independent. She goes from a jealous princess into a great queen.
Weekly Reader Philippa Gregory Edition: The King's Curse (The Plantagenet and Tudor Court Series Vol. VII) by Philippa Gregory; Dark End to the Plantagenet Family Focuses on Survival in Drastically Changing Times
Weekly Reader Philippa Gregory Edition: The King's Curse (The Plantagenet and Tudor Court Series Vol. VII) by Philippa Gregory; Dark End to the Plantagenet Family Focuses on Survival in Drastically Changing Times
By Julie Sara Porter
Bookworm Reviews
Spoilers: Historians know Lady Margaret Pole, the Countess of Salisbury for how she left the world rather than her involvement in it. The oldest of King Henry VIII's victims, she was executed in the Tower of London at age 67. When she was ordered to lower her head on the execution block, she refused and ran shrieking through the Tower. The executioner finally caught up to her and killed her on the spot. Ghost hunters, paranormal investigators, and believers of the supernatural have reported hearing, and sometimes seeing, her ghost haunting the Tower and reenacting her grisly death.
Philippa Gregory gives Lady Margaret great significance to her life than just her death. Instead she is the last remnant of the old guard: the final member of the Plantagenet immediate family that was directly involved in the War of the Roses (some descendants still remain to this day.) who sees the world that she once knew slowly dying around her, making way for a world she doesn't recognize.
In the previous books, Margaret was a supporting player in other's stories. She started out in the White Queen as the daughter of George Duke of Clarence, younger brother of King Edward IV. She was very young when her father was embroiled in an attempt to seize the throne and was executed by drowning in a vat of malmsy wine. In the White Princess, she was the friend and companion of Elizabeth of York as her brother became the center of a conspiracy to take the throne from Henry VII. She was then forced to watch as history repeated itself and her slow-witted brother was executed. Finally, in The Constant Princess, Margaret is older and charged with guarding the newlyweds Prince Arthur and Princess Katherine of Aragon forming a strong bond of friendship with them though they are the son and daughter-in-law of the king that executed her brother. In her old age, she learned to forgive.
Because that part of the story is well documented in the other books and doesn't offer anything new in the way of her friendships with Elizabeth of York and Katherine of Aragon, Margaret's chapters with the royals are probably the least interesting aspects of the book with one notable exception which I will get to later.
The more interesting parts to this book are the chapters in which Margaret is away from the Royal family and is involved in conflicts within her own family and the people on her lands.
Similar to Jacquetta of Luxembourg, the protagonist of Lady of the Rivers, Margaret spends a great deal of time helping her children receive advantageous positions and marriages. She is also in despair after the death of her husband, Sir Richard leaves her destitute. She appeals to King Henry VIII for help. In exchange, he appoints her oldest son, Henry 1st Baron Montague to become his friend and confidante and her second son, Reginald to Oxford to become a scholar for the king. These positions become useful after the king's noted marital troubles become public and Henry decides to declare his marriage to Katherine no longer valid. Montague becomes Margaret's palace insider letting her know the situation with the royals and Reginald gives her the official opinion from the Catholic Church.
Much of the book deals with the conflict of staying silent or speaking out. Margaret lies when she is asked whether Katherine and Arthur consummated their marriage. She tells the court that it was never consummated so Katherine can be cleared to marry Henry, even though she knows full well that it was.
She also claims to not know anything about whether Elizabeth Woodville and her daughter, Elizabeth of York cursed the Tudor family as the murderers of the Princes in Tower. She says this despite Elizabeth of York confessing to her about the curse.
Margaret has to make a difficult choice when everyone in England is forced to swear an oath that Henry's marriage to Katherine was invalid so he can marry Anne Boleyn. Margaret swears the oath and feels guilty because of her friendship with Katherine. However, she does this to protect her family.
She also questions when family members become more vocal against Henry. Her cousin, Edward Stafford is executed for treason and her son, Reginald becomes an outspoken critic against Henry when the king declares himself Supreme Head of the Church in England putting him in direct conflict with the Pope. The events with Stafford and Reginald put Margaret's family under suspicion and both times she reluctantly distances herself from them. Margaret's despair is particularly felt when she mourns her estrangement from Reginald who was her quiet serious boy that she can no longer associate with.
It makes sense that Margaret is not willing to lose any more family members after the loss of her parents and brother. Her strong familial relationship propels her to sacrifice the truth, honesty, her friendship with Katherine, when the former queen is exiled and her relationship with her cousin and one of her sons for the rest of the family. For Margaret survival of her family is first, last, and always the most important goal.
Much of the book deals with the conflict of staying silent or speaking out. Margaret lies when she is asked whether Katherine and Arthur consummated their marriage. She tells the court that it was never consummated so Katherine can be cleared to marry Henry, even though she knows full well that it was.
She also claims to not know anything about whether Elizabeth Woodville and her daughter, Elizabeth of York cursed the Tudor family as the murderers of the Princes in Tower. She says this despite Elizabeth of York confessing to her about the curse.
Margaret has to make a difficult choice when everyone in England is forced to swear an oath that Henry's marriage to Katherine was invalid so he can marry Anne Boleyn. Margaret swears the oath and feels guilty because of her friendship with Katherine. However, she does this to protect her family.
She also questions when family members become more vocal against Henry. Her cousin, Edward Stafford is executed for treason and her son, Reginald becomes an outspoken critic against Henry when the king declares himself Supreme Head of the Church in England putting him in direct conflict with the Pope. The events with Stafford and Reginald put Margaret's family under suspicion and both times she reluctantly distances herself from them. Margaret's despair is particularly felt when she mourns her estrangement from Reginald who was her quiet serious boy that she can no longer associate with.
It makes sense that Margaret is not willing to lose any more family members after the loss of her parents and brother. Her strong familial relationship propels her to sacrifice the truth, honesty, her friendship with Katherine, when the former queen is exiled and her relationship with her cousin and one of her sons for the rest of the family. For Margaret survival of her family is first, last, and always the most important goal.
Margaret's despair and loss throughout her long life and her nostalgia for days that will never return make The King's Curse one of the darkest books in the Plantagenet and Tudor Court Series.
Margaret holds onto the ideal that she is from an old royal family of the Plantagenets, so she bears a lot of animosity towards the young upstarts like Anne Boleyn. There is a real strong sense of the old generation dying and forced to make way for the young ones.
While the other books speak of horrible things like war, infanticide, spousal and child abuse, most of them carry a sense of hope and pride, particularly in the ambitions of the characters. Most of these ladies are not content to wait for better days. They take charge and make them happen. But with Margaret, there seems to be little that she can do, thereby increasing the hopelessness that someone in her position feels as the world changes without her involvement or input.
This helplessness increases the darkness in this book as we see the world not from the throne but the people on the outside.
Since Margaret is a Countess not a Queen, we get to view the people dwelling in her lands and learn how the instability in the Royal household affects them. Priests refuse to compromise their beliefs despite threats. Tenants worry when crops decrease and prices go up. Family members argue and break ties with each other over the oath.
All Margaret can do is help her people as much as she can.
Besides the outsider perspective, this book fills another need, one that Philippa Gregory omitted. Gregory never wrote a book from the perspective of Jane Seymour, feeling that her story had been told in The Other Boleyn Girl. Unfortunately, we get very little sense of her as a person in that book.
We finally get that much needed portrayal as Margaret gets to know Henry's third wife. As compared to the firy Katherine and the conniving Anne, Jane Seymour is depicted as a shy mousy girl who is kind but terrified of her new role and with good reason after one wife was exiled and another beheaded. Margaret is very protective towards her like a surrogate daughter that she feels is in over her head particularly when she asks for pardons for the participants in the Pilgrimage of Grace, a Catholic uprising against Henry. Jane also gives Henry, the long awaited legitimate son, Prince Edward before dying of childbirth.
Among the darkest aspects of the book is the repetition of the family tree. In most books in the series, a family tree is only in the frontispiece. But in The King's Curse, it is present throughout the book with roses colored in black to represent Plantagenet family members that die. As various members die either from illness, execution or other means another rose is darkened. When Margaret's youngest son, Geoffrey is arrested for treason, (it becomes punishable by death to speak against the king), he implicates his brother, Montague and other family members based on various conversations. All but Geoffrey are executed and the black roses continue.
Finally, Margaret is arrested, stripped of her title and land, and held in the Tower to meet her grisly final end. It is no surprise that the final page is the Plantagenet family tree filled with black roses as if sounding the death knell for the family.
The title the King's Curse is fitting not just for the curse that Elizabeth Woodville and Elizabeth of York give the Tudors that their oldest son and grandson will die young (Prince Arthur and King Edward VI) and end with a barren girl (Queen Elizabeth I). But the curse is also within King Henry VIII and how he curses his own people and himself. Lady Margaret Pole, Countess of Salisbury certainly saw that.
Margaret holds onto the ideal that she is from an old royal family of the Plantagenets, so she bears a lot of animosity towards the young upstarts like Anne Boleyn. There is a real strong sense of the old generation dying and forced to make way for the young ones.
While the other books speak of horrible things like war, infanticide, spousal and child abuse, most of them carry a sense of hope and pride, particularly in the ambitions of the characters. Most of these ladies are not content to wait for better days. They take charge and make them happen. But with Margaret, there seems to be little that she can do, thereby increasing the hopelessness that someone in her position feels as the world changes without her involvement or input.
This helplessness increases the darkness in this book as we see the world not from the throne but the people on the outside.
Since Margaret is a Countess not a Queen, we get to view the people dwelling in her lands and learn how the instability in the Royal household affects them. Priests refuse to compromise their beliefs despite threats. Tenants worry when crops decrease and prices go up. Family members argue and break ties with each other over the oath.
All Margaret can do is help her people as much as she can.
Besides the outsider perspective, this book fills another need, one that Philippa Gregory omitted. Gregory never wrote a book from the perspective of Jane Seymour, feeling that her story had been told in The Other Boleyn Girl. Unfortunately, we get very little sense of her as a person in that book.
We finally get that much needed portrayal as Margaret gets to know Henry's third wife. As compared to the firy Katherine and the conniving Anne, Jane Seymour is depicted as a shy mousy girl who is kind but terrified of her new role and with good reason after one wife was exiled and another beheaded. Margaret is very protective towards her like a surrogate daughter that she feels is in over her head particularly when she asks for pardons for the participants in the Pilgrimage of Grace, a Catholic uprising against Henry. Jane also gives Henry, the long awaited legitimate son, Prince Edward before dying of childbirth.
Among the darkest aspects of the book is the repetition of the family tree. In most books in the series, a family tree is only in the frontispiece. But in The King's Curse, it is present throughout the book with roses colored in black to represent Plantagenet family members that die. As various members die either from illness, execution or other means another rose is darkened. When Margaret's youngest son, Geoffrey is arrested for treason, (it becomes punishable by death to speak against the king), he implicates his brother, Montague and other family members based on various conversations. All but Geoffrey are executed and the black roses continue.
Finally, Margaret is arrested, stripped of her title and land, and held in the Tower to meet her grisly final end. It is no surprise that the final page is the Plantagenet family tree filled with black roses as if sounding the death knell for the family.
The title the King's Curse is fitting not just for the curse that Elizabeth Woodville and Elizabeth of York give the Tudors that their oldest son and grandson will die young (Prince Arthur and King Edward VI) and end with a barren girl (Queen Elizabeth I). But the curse is also within King Henry VIII and how he curses his own people and himself. Lady Margaret Pole, Countess of Salisbury certainly saw that.
Classics Corner: Vanity Fair by William Makepeace Thackeray; Thackeray’s Satire of Ambition and Vanity Starring One of the Best Anti-Heroines from English Literature
Classics Corner: Vanity Fair by William Makepeace Thackeray; Thackeray’s Satire of Ambition and Vanity Starring One of the Best Anti-Heroines from English Literature
By Julie Sara Porter
Bookworm Reviews
Spoilers: It makes sense that one of William Makepeace Thackeray’s most important metaphors throughout his epic novel, Vanity Fair, is to compare his characters and their situations to a puppet show.
To explain the novel, I have to backtrack to Pilgrim's Progress by John Bunyan. Not too many modern Readers may be familiar with the work, but it was a Medieval allegory in which a man named Christian (Subtlety was not in a Medieval writer's repertoire) travels through various locations with names like the Valley of Humility, the Palace Beautiful, and the Slough of Respond before he reached the Celestial City (i.e. Heaven). One of those locations is Vanity Fair, a fair in which unwary travelers buy medals, gowns, fancy decorations, and sinisterly enough spouses and children all to increase their pride and vanity.
Now Pilgrim's Progress is mostly recalled by readers of Little Women who associate that book with the role playing game the March Sisters play as they wait for their father to return from the Civil War. There is even a chapter called Vanity Fair in which Meg, the eldest sister, visits some rich friends, flirts, and is the recipient of gossip.
Also the title Vanity Fair calls to mind the famous Conde Nast magazine which still features provocative fashion spreads and articles. Vanity Fair is often seen as a place where the rich, famous, and fashionable show off their wealth and style. The people who long to be a part of that world are often drawn in by their fascination with the high life and interest in material objects, wealth, and success. Sometimes they feel those obsessions control them rather than the other way around.
Thackeray took the idea of vanity controlling others by treating all of his characters like puppets on a string. They are just dangling about and have no control over their words and actions. Instead their desires to move ahead, to gain wealth, and to be loved lead them instead.
This is not a puppet show for kids that Thackeray envisioned. He saw Life as a puppet show in which people's greed, pride, selfishness, and obsession are laid out for the public to see.
By far the most interesting character in Vanity Fair is Becky Sharp. When she enters the book, she is already a saucy young lady. She leaves boarding school along with her impoverished background behind.
She told other students that she was from a wealthy family that had fallen because of hard times. In reality, she is the daughter of an “opera girl” i.e. a courtesan and an artist. Her mother died young and her father was an abusive alcoholic who left her destitute.
Becky's background gives her a creative edge to see the world differently and reshape her world to fit her needs, but it also isolates her from others. In school, she was looked upon as a charity case and was not held in as high regard as the other students. Her only friend was Amelia Sedley, a sweet naive heiress who leaves school with her.
The teachers looked down on Becky because of her background. This disregard for a childhood that downgraded her is symbolized in the moment when she is given a religious treatise as a parting gift and she responds by throwing the book out of the carriage on the way out.
Becky has no solid background, no reliance or support from institutions, and no basis for ethics and morals so she can only rely on herself. Her maxim is that she could be a better person if she had a few thousand pounds. She is willing to do anything to get money, including marry it.
Becky stays with Amelia's family temporarily until she begins work as a governess, something that she is not looking forward to. While Amelia becomes romantically involved with George Osborne and his friend, William Dobbin bears an unrequited crush on her, Becky finds a possible means into wealth through Amelia’s brother, Jos.
Jos Sedley is not a catch by any means. He is overweight, a slob, and a big drinker. But he has also arrived from India with a fortune behind him and will inherit a large sum when his father dies. So Becky is willing to overlook his flaws to wed the big green. That is, until Jos makes a fool of himself at Vauxhall Pleasure Gardens by getting drunk and making ridiculous loud emotional declarations towards Becky. The scene humiliates both Becky and Jos. A shamed hung over Jos breaks his engagement with Becky, sending her to the governess position much to her chagrin.
Becky however makes lemonade with the sour lemons in the governess job. She befriends the wealthy Crawley family, becoming an eventual confidant to their feisty opinionated and very rich aunt and catching the eye of Sir Pitt Crawley, the paterfamilias. When Sir Pitt manages to work up the courage to finally propose to Becky, Becky turns him down because well you see... she's already married to Pitt's dashing handsome son, Rawdon.
Thus continues the pattern in Becky's life where she uses her charms, style, and charisma to become the center of attention, obtain prestige, money, or romance, becomes embroiled in scandal and controversy, and is ostracized or criticized by others, but bounces back by gaining powerful acquaintances. This is noticeable for the first time when she befriends the elderly Miss Crawley, who admires her forthright humor, sauciness, and tales of scandals as long as they don't affect her family. Of course Miss Crawley's view changes when Rawdon, who was once her favorite nephew, marries Becky then Miss Crawley cuts the elopers out of her will.
Becky realizes that she made a major miscalculation when the elderly Sir Pitt dies and his older son, also named Pitt, inherits the lot. While the elder Pitt might have been crude, uncouth, and no gentleman even though he had the title of one, at least Becky could have been set for life. Instead she married Rawdon and has to get by living (as one of the chapter titles can attest) “on nothing a year.”
However, Becky is able to seduce army officials so Rawdon can get higher positions and use her looks as a mark to distract other gamblers while Rawdon cheats at card games. When they end up living in Paris and London, Becky becomes the toast of the towns wowing the gentry and nobility with her wit, beauty, and sharp intelligent, traits the increasingly dull and dim Rawdon lacks.
That is what makes Becky so alluring: her resourcefulness and cunning ability to survive any situation. During the Napoleonic Wars when Brussels is left in a panic, Becky, who lives there with Amelia and other soldier's wives, makes plans to escape.
If she gets caught when the French Army arrives, then she reasons that she will just cozy up to a French soldier to ensure her survival. This doesn't happen and she manages to flee, but not before she fleeces Jos, who is tasked with protecting his sister but leaves to save his own skin, of her horse and carriage.
Even when she is at her lowest point, Becky is never at a loss for a plan. Long after the war is over, she is caught red handed with the Marquis Steyne by her husband, accepting jewelry and expensive gifts instead of trying to get Rawdon who is imprisoned for debt, released. She insists that she was not having an affair with Steyne, but she ends up disgraced and separated from her husband. Next we see Becky, she is living the high life on the Continent as a high priced courtesan once again charming the wealthy men with her various uh..talents and attributes. She eventually ends up as a companion and presumed lover to Jos (Rawdon is exiled to a governorship at a remote island where he dies of a fever.). Jos ultimately dies, under mysterious circumstances, leaving Becky his entire fortune.
No matter what Becky does, she is the actor the instigator in her life. She seizes a situation and takes control of it. She is in contrast to the more passive receptive, Amelia. Amelia never takes charge of a situation. Instead, she waits for someone to fix it for her.
While Becky is active, an agent of change, Amelia is dependent and has things happen to her rather than taking action for herself. When her father loses his money in risky speculation, Amelia waits for George Osborne to marry her. Then after she marries George, Amelia ignores his flirtations with other women holding him onto a pedestal, even after his death in the Napoleonic Wars.
George's death leaves Amelia destitute and rather than finding her way like Becky does, Amelia surrenders her son to be raised by her wealthy father-in-law. She also receives money secretly from Dobbin who has long loved her from afar.
She never breaks her heroic image of George's memory until Becky has to admit that she and George had an affair before he died. This news finally puts Amelia into the arms of William and they marry.
Amelia is always dependent upon a man to take care of her needs and others to make decisions for her. Unlike Becky, Amelia lives in the fragile passivity that is expected of a woman of her day.
Even the way that Amelia and Becky raise their sons is a marked contrast. Becky is a very distant and neglectful mother, disdainful of Rawdon's affection for their son, Rawdon. She leaves him in the care of relatives and housekeepers. Then when she is disgraced, she abandons him entirely. Amelia is a loving and devoted mother, doting on her son George's every word and action. Since he is born after his father's death, she holds him as a living memory of his father. When she surrenders him to his grandfather, it is a true moment of heartbreak for her.
While Amelia's relationship with her son, George is touching for the modern Reader, a Reader in Thackeray's time would have a difference of opinion. In fact most wealthy parents would have favored Becky's approach and had children less as beings of devotion than as little heirs of their fortune that were best not seen or heard. Children were held more as a status symbol than as individuals in their own right.
Status is what it's all about in Vanity Fair. While Becky is held under scrutiny by other characters, in truth she is no different than anyone else in the book. All of the characters are motivated by their drives for money or position. Many of the male characters like George and Rawdon seek positions of authority. The younger members of the Crawley family wait with baited breath for older members to die do they can inherit.
Even the seemingly good characters like Amelia and William are motivated by desires that are created from their vanity. Amelia continues to hold onto her romantic view of George, despite obvious evidence that he was not the hero of her dreams. She also strings William along, even after she learns of his affection for her.
William's view of her is as a divine goddess that is perfection herself. His unrealistic view of Amelia continues as he does favors for her such as buying an expensive piano in secret and giving her money so she can be reunited with her son. Amelia and he have a relationship where he needs to admire someone and Amelia needs to be admired.
The final pages even suggest that vanity hits them even after they finally marry, when Amelia sighs that William loves his daughter more than her. She is upset that her admirer has transferred his admiration to someone else, even if that someone else is her own daughter.
It's not a surprise Becky is the way she is. In a way, she is similar to Sammy Glick in What Makes Sammy Run? By Budd Schulberg. Schulberg saw a pattern of behavior that created someone like Sammy: a second generation American immigrant who is a victim of poverty and prejudice so he schemes and hustles to get ahead because that's all he knows.
That's how Thackeray saw Becky. She is not a separate entity from the society around her. She is the society around her. All of the vanity, conceit, greed, class and social structure connived against her so she pushed back by being the most vain, the fastest, and the most infamous to get there.
The characters in Vanity Fair hang by their strings of pride and vanity controlling them. Some like Amelia continue to helplessly dangle, while some like Becky take the strings and control the show themselves.
She never breaks her heroic image of George's memory until Becky has to admit that she and George had an affair before he died. This news finally puts Amelia into the arms of William and they marry.
Amelia is always dependent upon a man to take care of her needs and others to make decisions for her. Unlike Becky, Amelia lives in the fragile passivity that is expected of a woman of her day.
Even the way that Amelia and Becky raise their sons is a marked contrast. Becky is a very distant and neglectful mother, disdainful of Rawdon's affection for their son, Rawdon. She leaves him in the care of relatives and housekeepers. Then when she is disgraced, she abandons him entirely. Amelia is a loving and devoted mother, doting on her son George's every word and action. Since he is born after his father's death, she holds him as a living memory of his father. When she surrenders him to his grandfather, it is a true moment of heartbreak for her.
While Amelia's relationship with her son, George is touching for the modern Reader, a Reader in Thackeray's time would have a difference of opinion. In fact most wealthy parents would have favored Becky's approach and had children less as beings of devotion than as little heirs of their fortune that were best not seen or heard. Children were held more as a status symbol than as individuals in their own right.
Status is what it's all about in Vanity Fair. While Becky is held under scrutiny by other characters, in truth she is no different than anyone else in the book. All of the characters are motivated by their drives for money or position. Many of the male characters like George and Rawdon seek positions of authority. The younger members of the Crawley family wait with baited breath for older members to die do they can inherit.
Even the seemingly good characters like Amelia and William are motivated by desires that are created from their vanity. Amelia continues to hold onto her romantic view of George, despite obvious evidence that he was not the hero of her dreams. She also strings William along, even after she learns of his affection for her.
William's view of her is as a divine goddess that is perfection herself. His unrealistic view of Amelia continues as he does favors for her such as buying an expensive piano in secret and giving her money so she can be reunited with her son. Amelia and he have a relationship where he needs to admire someone and Amelia needs to be admired.
The final pages even suggest that vanity hits them even after they finally marry, when Amelia sighs that William loves his daughter more than her. She is upset that her admirer has transferred his admiration to someone else, even if that someone else is her own daughter.
It's not a surprise Becky is the way she is. In a way, she is similar to Sammy Glick in What Makes Sammy Run? By Budd Schulberg. Schulberg saw a pattern of behavior that created someone like Sammy: a second generation American immigrant who is a victim of poverty and prejudice so he schemes and hustles to get ahead because that's all he knows.
That's how Thackeray saw Becky. She is not a separate entity from the society around her. She is the society around her. All of the vanity, conceit, greed, class and social structure connived against her so she pushed back by being the most vain, the fastest, and the most infamous to get there.
The characters in Vanity Fair hang by their strings of pride and vanity controlling them. Some like Amelia continue to helplessly dangle, while some like Becky take the strings and control the show themselves.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)