Friday, February 28, 2020

March's Reading List



March's Reading List



February started out well, but ended up not filling as many reviews as I would like. I got sick in the middle of the month. I also have a secret project to do which took up a lot of time but is very fulfilling.(Thank you for the opportunity, You Know Who You Are.)


This month, I am moving some of my intended reads to this month. Hopefully, I will be caught up by the end of the month.




New Book Alert: Murder in the Multiverse by R.E. McLean



Weekly Reader: Spite Fences by Trudy Krischer



Classics Corner: The Women's Room by Marilyn French (A book published the month of your birthday)


Weekly Reader: The Source of Self-Regard Selected Essays Speeches and Meditations by Toni Morrison (A book with more than 20 letters in the title)


Weekly Reader: The Lazy Bachelor by Catherine Dove


New Book Alert: The Girl Who Found The Sun by Matthew Cox



Weekly Reader: The Witches Are Coming by Lindy West (A book about or involving social media)


Weekly Reader:Hedy's Folly: The Life and Brilliant Inventions of Hedy Lamarr by Richard Rhodes (A book by or about a woman involved in STEM)


Classics Corner Birthday Book: One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel Garcia Marquez (A book published in the 20th Century)


Weekly Reader: Olive Kitteridge by Elizabeth Strout (A book that passes the Bechdel Test)


New Book Alert: Song For A Lost Kingdom by Steve Moretti


Weekly Reader: The Other Queen (The Plantangenet and Tudor Court Series Vol. XV) by Philippa Gregory




If you have a book that you want to see reviewed or edited, do not hesitate to contact me at
Email: juliesaraporter@gmail.com
Twitter: @JulieSaraPorte1
LinkedIn: Julie Sara Porter
Facebook: Julie Sara Porter

Prices are as follows:
Review-$10.00-20.00 (except for previous arrangements with certain groups such as BookTasters, NetGalley, and Blackthorn Book Tours).
Beta Reading-$10.00-20.00
Research inc. Citation and Bibliography-$20.00-50.00
Line/Copy Editor-$100.00-200.00
Proofreading-100.00-200.00
Ghostwriting/Co-Authoring Books-$200.00-300.00

All prices are subject to change.
Payments can be sent to my PayPal account at juliesaraporter@gmail.com.




Weekly Reader: The Jane Austen Book Club by Karen Joy Fowler; Cute Romantic, but Fluffy Love Letter to Austen's Work



Weekly Reader: The Jane Austen Book Club by Karen Joy Fowler; Cute Romantic, but Fluffy Love Letter to Austen's Work

By Julie Sara Porter

Bookworm Reviews




PopSugar Reading Challenge: A book about a book club

Spoilers: Okay, I admit it. I am not by any means a fan of Jane Austen

At best, I find her books light fluffy romance, but nowhere near as well-written as other writers of her time like Charlotte Bronte or George Eliot. At worst, I find her overrated and her books and characters repetitive and borderline aggravating.


My personal experience with Austen's works are as follows: I find Emma humorous with a flawed but adorable and at times purposely annoying protagonist. Northanger Abbey is a lot of fun with its parody of Gothic literature. Sense and Sensibility, is okay but mostly average. Pride and Prejudice is  overrated with two annoying protagonists that are more annoying in their omnipresence (though more tolerable than those in Wuthering Heights). I am undecided on Mansfield Park and Persuasion since I have not read either. I have yet to read one of her books that I liked beyond.. .well just okay and many authors that I like better.




However, Jane Austen in February cannot be avoided. It's like cat videos and Top Ten lists on YouTube or Laura Brannigan's "Gloria" on St. Louis radio stations during hockey season. It's inevitable that Jane Austen and romance go together, so instead of ignoring it, might as well suck it up and enjoy it and read either one of her books or a book about her books.

In this case, I read The Jane Austen Book Club by Karen Joy Fowler. While I still am not a Jane Austen fan, I will always recommend any book that celebrates the importance of reading and where characters identity themselves with the situations that are found in books. On that level, I could not recommend The Jane Austen Book Club enough.

It is a fun cute lighter-than-fluff book that explores the troubled love lives of the members of the eponymous club. While it can be read and appreciated by any fans of romance, chick lit, or books about books, it will be best loved by fans of Jane Austen who will catch and enjoy the parallels between the characters and their literary counterparts.


The Book Club is started by best friends 40-somethings Jocelyn and Sylvia. Besides them the antendees are 28-year-old French teacher Prudie, Sylvia's lesbian thrill-seeker daughter, Allegra, Bernadette, a 50ish woman with multiple marriages to her credit, and Grigg, the lone male member. The six members are required to read all six of Austen's novels and one member has to lead the discussion and host the group at her or his house all while dealing with their own romances and problems.


The club members are a charming relatable bunch that play off each other very well. Many Readers will recognize the characters's personalities and quirks as people they may know or are. There is Jocelyn who loves to walk her Rhodesian Ridgebacks and is something of a control freak who likes to micromanage her friend's lives while ignoring her own lonely unmarried status. Sylvia is a recently divorced single mother who has been burned by love and is not eager to open herself up to the possibilities of another love.

Grigg prefers to live in the worlds of his favorite science fiction novels and conventions and often has trouble being the sole male among his three sisters and his new female friends, which causes him to be permanently friend zoned.

Bernadette loves to regale her friends with her colorful stories about her stage parents and her various flawed husbands with humor to disguise how lonely and troubled her life was. Allegra lives for exciting pastimes like skydiving and mountain climbing and being with women who give her an exciting hard time. Prudie is married, but can't ignore the advances that her students make towards her, nor her and her husband's many disagreements and annoying characteristics.


Fowler parallels each character with a specific Austen novel and the novel helps guide the character through their love lives. Jocelyn is compared to Emma with her desire to make matches with her friends. Like Emma Wodehouse, she sets her friend up with someone with whom she falls in love. She invites Grigg to the group to set him up with Sylvia, but realizes that she has fallen for him herself.

Meanwhile Grigg's interest in science fiction is much like Catherine Moreland's obsession with Gothic Romance novels in Northanger Abbey. Both use their preferred genres as means of escapism from complacent and conflicting reality. Grigg also uses his science fiction novels as means of communication, such as recommending Ursula K. LeGuin's novels to Jocelyn.

Allegra's literary counterparts is Marianne Dashwood in Sense and Sensibility. Like Marianne, Allegra is a woman of deep emotion who lives for new experiences. She doesn't always listen to the advice provided by her more sensible mother, especially when it comes to her relationship with her latest girlfriend, Corine. She suffers a near emotional breakdown when she learns that Corrine stole parts of her life for her writing inspiration. Even when she is in a new relationship in the end, there is much discussion whether this relationship will last.

Like Fanny Price of Mansfield Park, Prudie has to learn to face life on her own with the death of her mother. She also is permanently confused by the open flirtations around her while maintaining a deeper more loving connection with her husband.

Bernadette's story is like that of Elizabeth Bennett in Pride and Prejudice. As a child, she was used by her mother to achieve child stardom like Mrs. Bennett uses her daughters to find wealthy husbands. She also recognizes the stubborn pride and arrogant assumptions that filled her previous marriages. She is always ready with a quick word and witty comment like many of the most loquacious of Austen's characters.

Finally, Sylvia is compared to Anne Elliot of Persuasion, the oldest and final of Austen's protagonists. She too had been left alone and deserted by a former love. When she and her ex meet again, they have to consider how much they have changed and whether they want to sever all ties or get back together.

The book has the usual formulaic ending where characters are paired up and learn lessons. Some relationships are a bit abrupt and one might make modern Readers cringe more than it would have in Austen's day. But still it's a cute book, one that is good reading for Valentine's Day or for anyone who wants to read a book that celebrates a love of reading.

Like any good book about reading, the characters recognize themselves within the books. Jane Austen's novels provide escape and friendship as they discuss the plots, characters, and themes. They also provide their own answers towards their own lives and loves.


Weekly Reader: The Nickel Boys by Colson Whitehead; Follow-Up To The Underground Railroad Surpasses Expectations



Weekly Reader: The Nickel Boys by Colson Whitehead; Follow-Up To The Underground Railroad Surpasses Expectations

By Julie Sara Porter

Bookworm Reviews


PopSugar Reading Challenge: A book that won an award in 2019 (Time Magazine Best Books of the Decade)



Spoilers: When a book becomes such a monster hit, there is much speculation and anticipation whether the author's follow-up will be just as well regarded as the previous hit. Take Colson Whitehead for example. His 2016 novel, The Underground Railroad was everywhere. The ciritcal and commercial success hit multiple best seller lists and won various awards including the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction and National Book Award for Fiction.

Naturally, when Whitehead's novel, The Nickel Boys was published in 2019, there were concerns whether it could compete against Railroad. Could Colson Whitehead top himself?

Fortunately, Whitehead proves that the successor can more than meet the standards set by the predecessor. The Nickel Boys is just as much a hit as The Underground Railroad. Time Magazine listed it as one of the Best Books of the Decade. It is a finalist for the National Book Award.

As for writing, The Nickel Boys not only meets The Underground Railroad in terms of style, it surpasses it in terms of characterization, theme, and quality.


The Nickel Boys takes place in the Nickel Academy, the fictional equivalent to the real-life Arthur G. Dozier School for Boys in Mariana, Florida. The Dozier School ran from 1900-2011 and gained a reputation for abuse, beatings, torture and murder of the boys by staff. In 2009, the school underwent a full investigation after the school failed a state investigation. The investigation included exploring the various unmarked graves on the site which told of various boys who were tortured and beaten to death or shot while trying to escape. The authorities identified 55 burials and nearly 100 deaths at the school.


Whitehead took the inspiration of this sad true story and created a novel that is heartbreaking, but also challenging with its themes of institutional racism and the power and control certain authority figures have towards those who are perceived as weaker than them.


This book is set in the early 1960's and focuses mostly on Elwood Curtis, a bright African-American boy from Tallahassee, Florida. Elwood works at the Richmond Hotel kitchen and reads books like classics and the Hardy Boys in his spare time. He lives with his grandmother after the disappearance of his parents who moved west to find work and never returned.

The greatest gift that Elwood ever received is a record of Martin Luther King's speeches. He plays them on an endless loop and is drawn by King's philosophies of nonviolence and loving one's enemies. In school, he is committed to his studies and social activism, the latter of which worries his grandmother.


One day, Elwood hitches a ride in a stolen car to his college classes when he and the other riders are arrested. Elwood is sentenced to The Nickel Academy, which is the closest thing to Hell on Earth to put things mildly. At The Nickel Academy, Elwood is subjected first hand to the mistreatments and punishments, including beatings, starvation, sexual assault, and torture. Not to mention the private rooms where those considered the worst offenders are sent and don't always come back out. Through it all, Elwood tries to hold fast to Martin Luther King's philosophies.

While this is going on, we peer into Elwood's current life as a New York City businessman. Even though other former inmates have reunited through social media, Elwood has not. He tries to live only in the present, though his troubled current life suggests that his past as a Nickel Boy still stays with him. He suffers from PTSD and is very uncomfortable in his current relationship. His past at the Nickel Academy isn't far behind as an investigation uncovers various unmarked graves and Elwood has to confront the Academy with all the suffering that he endured.


The Nickel Boys is the kind of book that is hard to forget. It is gripping and terrifying to read about how cruel and dehumanizing some people can be to other human beings. Much of the behavior is built upon the racist view of looking at someone as an "other", someone who they perceive as less than human. Once a certain people are dehumanized, it becomes easier for some to do deplorable things to them.

The moments between the inmates and the sadistic employees are gripping because of the abuse that the boys endure because of the racist dehumanization.


This book invokes comparisons to Native Son and Invisible Man in how it challenges not only the individual racist acts, but the institutional racism and conferred dominance that allow those acts to exist. Similar to Invisible Man's haunting Battle Royale chapter there is an early example of the systematic racism that Elwood endures. While working at the hotel, Elwood enters into an employee contest in which a fine set of encyclopedias are the prize. Elwood wins the contest, but loses in life when he learns that the encyclopedias are dummy copies and have nothing written in them. Elwood is set up to be humiliated by a society that demeans him for their own amusement.


Unlike the Narrator of Invisible Man however, Elwood's pacifism is not held up for ridicule and setting him up for constant humiliation by white society. While he is abused in Nickel, he reveals a true strength despite his captivity. He stands up for a fellow inmate who is threatened with sexual assault and gets beaten as a result. Another time, he takes King's "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" to heart and composes his own "Letter from a Nickel Academy" exposing the school and the staff for the house of horrors that it is. Even though Elwood sometimes finds it hard, he repeats the words, "Do to us what you will and we will still love you," like a mantra even when he doesn't want to.

While Elwood takes the path of nonviolence, another inmate proves to be a contrast. Elwood befriends Jack Turner, a more cynical inmate. Jack doesn't have the same ideals as Elwood. He is from a more violent criminal background. He is sharper, fiery, and prefers to make his point clear with a fist and sometimes a smart comment. He is more of a fighter and is willing to challenge his captivity and the staff through action. To Whitehead's credit, he never pushes one view over the other. Instead the book suggests that people challenge racism and their forced circumstances in different ways and that there is no one specific way that people can, or should, do it.


A plot twist opens many possibilities and causes the Reader to rethink the characters and themes. But it also says that Elwood and Jack's abilities to challenge the system around them will be remembered and in the present, put them in a situation to confront this dark past so that it can never be repeated.


The Nickel Boys is more than a successful best-selling and critically acclaimed follow-up to The Underground Railroad. With its better writing, compelling characters, and strong theme, it is the superior.

New Book Alert: The Unholy by Paul DeBlassie III; Terrifying, but Meaningful Horror Novel About Religion Vs. Spirit



New Book Alert: The Unholy by Paul DeBlassie III; Terrifying, But Meaningful Horror Novel About Religion Vs. Spirit

By Julie Sara Porter

Bookworm Reviews




Spoilers: In a time where many people flaunt their religion as an excuse to justify hateful, bigoted, mysoginistic, and even criminal behavior, a genre novel like Paul DeBlassie III's The Unholy graphically and beautifully demonstrates the difference that lies between religion vs. spirit. It shows how some people extol religious values, but don't actually live according to those principles while others seek to have personal connections to spirit and the world around them.




Claire Sanchez, director of Mental Health Workers and Natural Therapeutic Services is the latest in a long line of Apache Medicine Women, descended from Lozen, warrior, medicine woman, and advisor to Geronimo. Unfortunately, a childhood tragedy in which she witnessed her mother being murdered by a mysterious man has stifled her spiritual practice. Instead, she focuses on her career in caring for the patients at Ecclesia Dei Psychiatric Hospital and butting heads with the Catholic organization that is in charge of the hospital and has a fanatical hold on their followers and everyone around them.




Unfortunately, terrible things happen which cause Claire to return to her spiritual studies. Patients are dying under mysterious circumstances. Authorities, particularly those who are affiliated with Ecclesia Dei, stonewall any investigations and questions suggesting that they have something to hide. Claire is also hit with some bloody, violent, and frightening visions and premonitions that are veered towards Ecclesia Dei. She is also being stalked and threatened by members, particularly their sinister leader, Archbishop William Anarch.




The book is filled with scary and suspenseful moments. Like any good horror novel, the scariest part is the uncertainty. Are the things the characters experience real, hallucinations, or visions from beyond? When one of Claire's patients starts raging about dark spirits and being stalked by evil forces, both Claire and the Reader wonder is she exhibiting signs of schizophrenia? She also had medicine woman training, so is she being warned by other forces? Or is she telling the truth? It's a frightening concept and it becomes even more frightening knowing that no, they aren't paranoid. People really are trying to kill them.




Claire also experiences some terrifying visions. She goes to an Ecclesia Dei service and feels complete nausea. She sees crows, birds of death, in places where Ecclesia Dei members have their rituals. While other novels would say that the visions are sent by Satan or are the threat, what Claire and the Reader learns is that they are warnings. As scary as they are, the visions are trying to protect her from the real evil, the evil that lies in the dark hearts of her fellow human beings.




Claire is a well-developed protagonist. There is a real sense of her legacy as a medicine woman being stretched through time. Hers is a calling that she realizes quickly that she can't run from, nor hide behind science. She has to face that traumatic time and in turn face the spirits that surround her, before she can face Archbishop Anarch.




The book alternates between Claire's point of view and that of Anarch and it's been awhile since I have read such a loathsome antagonist, but deBlassie's gift is in making him so hateful yet Anarch's conflict with Claire so interesting and entertaining.

Anarch is the perfect example of the religious hypocrite, one who cares more for the financial and power gain that he receives as a religious leader than he cares about saving souls. He uses his sermons as scare tactics to entice his followers to go after people that he considers unworthy. He is not shy about using a parishioner's weakness against them to get his way, especially if said parishioner is a pretty young woman with doubts about her faith that he can provide ,ahem, hands-on counseling for.




There are some psychological insights to Anarch's character, particularly in his conversations with his manipulative dying mother that provide some depth to his character. Thankfully, they don't make him sympathetic. If anything, his background makes him even more unpleasant, especially when he strikes back at those he feels responsible.




The Unholy is the perfect example of a supernatural thriller done right. It scares you then makes you think deeper.

New Book Alert: The Baron and the Enchantress (The Enchantress Book 3) by Paullett Golden; Excellent Beginning and Ending Marred By Dragging Repetitive Middle



New Book Alert: The Baron and The Enchantress (The Enchantress Book 3) by Paullett Golden; Excellent Beginning and Ending Marred By Dragging and Repetitive Middle

By Julie Sara Porter

Bookworm Reviews




Spoilers: Paullett Golden's Historical Romance, The Baron and The Enchantress, is like the little girl with the curl in the middle of her forehead from the nursery rhyme. When it is good, it is very good but when it is bad, it's horrid.

Well not really horrid, just dull and repetitive.

It begins well with an interesting premise in which a working class woman learns that she is descended from a noble family and ends well with lovers united, goals met, and families grown stronger. However, the steps between conflict and resolution are marred by a long slow trip through the same situation repeated over and over with barely any change in character and plot.


Lilith Chambers is an 18th century midwife who was raised and educated in an orphanage when news breaks out that she is the long-lost sister of Sebastian Lancaster, Earl of Roddam. She was raised as Sebastian's full sister by who she believed were her birth parents. Unfortunately, after the death of her loving adopted mother, her abusive father, the former Earl, sends her to an orphanage where she learns that she is actually the illegitimate daughter of the former Earl and a servant woman. After the Earl's death, Sebastian seeks to reunite his family by drawing Lilith back into the family.

Lilith's skills as a midwife proves useful in assisting Sebastian's wife, Lizbeth through a difficult delivery. She also captures the interest of Walter Hobbs, The Baron Collingwood. Walter is capitvated by Lilith's independent fiery spirit and she is drawn by his altruistic nature. The two become romantically involved, but Lilith is concerned that the revelation of her illegitimate birth could cause problems with her new-found family and love life.


The book starts out strong with characters that defy traditional romance expectations. One of the more unique refreshing takes with Lilith's age. She's 33. When most Historical Romance female protagonists usually are in their late teens and early twenties, it's nice to read about one who is approximately the same age as her usual readership. Lilith is a woman who has had plenty of life experiences and an older woman's more cynical outlook on life.

Also, Lilith is someone who is just as interested in pursuing a career as she is in getting married. Most of the early chapters focuses on Lizbeth's pregnancy and Lilith helping her. Her interactions with Lizbeth such as purposelyt contradicting the physician's reactionary medical advice reveal that she is good at her job.

She also teaches at the orphanage in which she was raised. She aids young girls in their scholarly pursuits, particularly in Math and Science. She also wants to help unwed troubled mothers, like her own birth mother, who are alone and abandoned. Lilith is someone with a great brain and a willingness to use it to help others.


Sebastian, Walter, and their family are also nice surprises as well. One would expect a wealthy titled family to look down on their poorer relation, but they don't. Sebastian welcomes her with open arms. Lizbeth instantly treats her like a much beloved sister, even before she saves her and her baby's lives. One would expect Lizbeth's aunt and Walter's mother, Hazel, to turn her nose up at Lilith's arrival. But after giving some terrified early misgivings during Lizbeth's delivery, she recalls her own rags to riches upbringing and welcomes Lilith grandly.

Walter in particular is also an interesting romantic figure. Like Lilith, he too dreams of a life of significance. He wants to do something important with his wealth and title. When he hears about Lilith's upbringing, he decides to fund an orphanage. While Lilith questions this, he is clearly committed to the goal and wouldn't mind having the assistance of a certain attractive educator/midwife in achieving it.

It is a nice departure to see noble people in literature using their resources to help others revealing that nobility isn't always just an inherited name. Sometimes it is an adjective that describes upstanding character.


Unfortunately, Golden does too good a job of revealing their acceptance of Lilith, that there is really nowhere for the book to go. There are some stereotypical snobbish aristocrats, but they don't really develop the plot that much. There is also an opportunistic clergyman acquaintance of Lilith's who becomes too obsessed with her. This subplot hints that the clergyman could make trouble for Lilith, but apart from having a case of foot-in-mouth disease not much happens and his story is arbitrarily solved.

Instead most of the book focuses on Lilith's lack of acceptance towards her new family, not theirs toward her. She constantly makes assumptions about the wealthy that are discredited by the actions of Walter, Sebastian, et al. Even after she is proven wrong, she still thinks of them as elitist snobs. She started out as an interesting strong willed character, but quickly devolves into a judgemental reverse snob.

I know that she was raised in an orphanage, but she is allegedly a woman of great brilliance and intelligence. Surely, her experience with Sebastian's family should serve as a counterexample to her assumptions. Not to mention that she should consider that if stereotypes aren't true about her, what makes her think that they are true about them. In fact, the more that they, particularly Walter, try to welcome her, the more she resists. I suppose it's supposed to make her endearing, but honestly it makes her look like a hypocrite.

This argument between Lilith's assumptions and Walter's actions keeps coming up and is repeated as though there isn't anything else that the book has to do. The problem may be because the story takes place en media res after Lilith's identity had been revealed in the previous novel, The Earl and the Enchantress. With a strong introduction, there may not have been anywhere else for this book to go.


Thankfully, Golden does salvage the ending into a sweet resolution that works well in which lovers are not only united, but they make plans to open that orphanage and home for unwed mothers, to help the next generation.

The Baron and the Enchantress starts and ends so we'll that it is a shame that the middle could use some of the same magic to become equally as enchanting as the rest of the book.



Friday, February 21, 2020

Weekly Reader Philippa Gregory Edition: The Last Tudor (The Plantagenet and Tudor Court Series Vol. XIV) by Philippa Gregory; The Tudor Family Line Ends on an Average Note



Weekly Reader Philippa Gregory Edition: The Last Tudor (The Plantangenet and Tudor Court Series Vol. XIV) by Philippa Gregory; The Tudor Family Line Ends on An Average Note




By Julie Sara Porter

Bookworm Reviews




Spoilers: It's fitting that The Last Tudor is the final book written and the penultimate chronologically in The Plantagenet and Tudor Court Series. It presents the best and worst qualities that the previous books had in one book. This book alone is a checklist of what Phillippa Gregory did right and wrong in the entire series.




This time the book focuses on Jane Grey and her sisters, Katherine and Mary. Jane was the cousin of King Edward VI whom he declared his heir after his death instead of his sisters, Mary and Elizabeth. After, Edward's death, his guardian Lord Dudley connived to have Jane and her husband, his son, Guildford, put on the throne. Jane was queen for only nine days when supporters of Mary Tudor intervened, dethroned Jane, and declared Mary queen. Jane was eventually executed along with her husband and both of their fathers.



Jane Grey probably gets a minor footnote in history if that, but her sisters get barely any mention at all. Katherine Grey married Ned Seymour, a courtier and distant cousin by marriage, despite refusal from Queen Elizabeth. She eventually got arrested and gave birth to one son while in prison. She was released, but ended up giving birth to a daughter and spending the rest of her life separated from her husband and son while under house arrest.

Mary Grey's story was even more interesting. She was a Little Person, under 4" tall. She too married without the Queen's permission to Elizabeth's sergeant porter, Thomas Keyes who stood at 6"7. Mary served as lady in waiting under Elizabeth, but eventually she too fell out of favor and both she and her husband were arrested. Keyes was reportedly confined to a cell much too small for his large body. While Mary was under house arrest, Elizabeth eventually had her released.


The Last Tudor covers many of the themes that make the Gregory novels so great. Among them is the strength and rivalry of sisterhood. Unlike the previous sisters, the Boleyns, the Nevilles, and the Tudors, the Greys don't bare any animosity towards each other. Oh, they have differences of opinion, but those are mostly confined to just conflicting personalities rather than any real attempt to steal the throne or a position from each other. It's nice to see at least one Gregory sorority act like real sisters instead of sworn enemies.


Part of the way that Gregory does this is contrasting the sisters' personalities so they bounce off each other. Jane is much more bookish and studious. She is the most spiritual as she looks upon her ascendency as a calling from God to lead the English into Protestantism. Katherine is the most easy-going and dizziest. She is also an animal lover and is usually seen with different cats, dogs, birds, and a monkey that she names Mr. Nozzle. She is swept up in her love for Ned and when they are separated longs to be a family with him. Mary is the boldest and most outspoken. She constantly cracks jokes about her height or other things. She also has a steadfast determination to survive and she does everything she can, even deny her marriage, to ensure that survival.



We also see the theme of seeing historical characters through different eyes. Just like Katherine of Aragon and the players during the War of the Roses, Elizabeth is looked on differently here than she is in the previous books. The Queen's Fool and The Virgin's Lover were aware of her flaws, but also recognized her strengths as a cunning leader, a master strategist, a learned scholar, and a courageous fighter and survivor. The Grey Sisters see her as at best a frivolous egoist who values her own happiness (such as her relationship with Robert Dudley) over anything else. At worst, they see her as a cruel and capricious tyrant who turns on people for a whim and then just as quickly pardons them.

The reasonings behind Katherine and Mary's arrests are not fully explained, as they are meant to be arbitrary. Though they more have to do with being the last in the line of Protestant Tudor heirs. (Most of the others such Mary Stuart and Margaret Douglas are Catholic). While the book goes out of it's way to show that The Grey Sisters themselves are innocent of any plots against the queen, Elizabeth's haters aren't above using them as pawns in their means to dethrone her (like Jane was).

However the Gray Sisters themselves have another theory on why Elizabeth is so hateful towards thrm. Both believe that it is because Elizabeth envies their chances for happy marriages and she feels that if she has to be miserable then so do they. They think that she doesn't want the spotlight on anyone but herself. Their views are a bit childish, but they do come from fear and uncertainty. Sometimes, you don't know the specific reason why you fell out of someone's favor, so you simplify it in your head. Gregory does a good job of translating that uncertainty.

Gregory's gift for narration also falls into play here. She wisely separates the sisters' stories into three individual parts, allowing each sister to tell her story with the appropriate beginning, middle, and end. She also does some interesting framing devices that tie the three parts together. Each husband is introduced as a minor character in the previous story, only to take center stage in the next story as the intended of his Grey sister.

Some situations play out in all three stories. For example, Katherine's monkey companion, Mr. Nozzle is a source of irritation to Jane and she constantly wants to have him removed from her sight. For Katherine, he is an exotic pet to love, spoil, and let him be admired as a pet of the lady's chamber. By the time he gets around to Mary after she is under house arrest, Mr. Nozzle becomes her last link to her sisters so she keeps him into old age. One of the more delightful images in the book is the final scene in which an older Mary, still small, is dressed in black with a red petticoat underneath and walks a now gray Mr. Nozzle wearing Tudor green.


The biggest framing devices are the letters each sister writes to the next one while she is in prison. They reveal a lot about who they are as people. Jane's letter to Katherine is very clinical and impersonal. Instead of appealing to Katherine as a family member, Jane regards her just as someone that she thinks will carry on her legacy. The words that echo throughout are "learn you to die." Jane is someone who lives her life in her own head and according to her Protestant values. She goes along with her father and the Dudley family because she feels that becoming queen is God's plan. However, when it falls apart and her supporters turn against her (most heartbreaking of all is the moment when Jane's own father turns his coat and pleads for Mary), she realizes that it was brought upon by pride and ambition, things that she thought that she was against. She realizes that she too was ambitious in her own way and that she went along with the plot not for God's glory but her own. The only thing that she can do now is die for her faith as a martyr.

By contrast, Katherine's final letters to Mary are warm and filled with emotion and love, the kind of person that she was. Rather than learning to die, Katherine is more interested in learning to live or more specifically learning to love. She is someone who has a deep love for people and animals. While she is often the central

figure in plots against Elizabeth, she is never really involved in them. In fact there are several times when she states that she would rather have a happy marriage to Ned and lots of children than the throne.

Mary of course has no letter to write and no sister to receive it. But that makes sense to her character. Unlike Jane who is acted upon by the ambitions of others and her religious views and Katherine who is acted upon by her emotions, Mary is only acted upon by herself. She is the most active of the trio. When Katherine dithers whether marrying Ned is the right decision, Mary marries Thomas. Katherine languishes in prison brokenhearted, Mary remains outside still serving under Elizabeth but secretly plotting her escape. Even in prison, she manages to make the most of her survival by reuniting with the few family members that remain such as Katherine's children and trying to send letters to Thomas.


As I mentioned before, Gregory did so much right with this book, but she also did so much wrong too. One of the biggest problems with this book is that the longest story, Katherine's, is the most boring. While the early passages of Katherine and Ned's courtship is sweet, her imprisonment is less interesting and that covers most of that part. It might have been salvageable if Katherine was able to do anything while in there, perhaps but she spends most of the time in tears unable to do anything about her situation. Yes, I know prison is tough but that's no excuse to waste over 200 pages talking about it.

Jane and Mary's stories are far more interesting, but way too short.Jane's story is the most well known and Mary's not so much. But either one could have been expanded upon. For example, we get some tell of Jane's education, but we aren't shown it particularly her friendship with Kateryn Parr. Okay, she was queen for nine days but she barely sits on the throne before getting forced off. A few more chapters, even short ones, to describe her plans for ruling could have been added. And what about Mary? We are given very little of her and Thomas together. Shouldn't we get to know them as a couple before fate and Elizabeth drive them apart from each other?

Another problem in this book calls back to Lady of the Rivers, forgoing a more interesting protagonist for a lesser interesting one who only hears about the interesting one's adventures. This time Mary and Katherine get told about Mary Queen of Scot's marriages to the Dauphin of France, Lord Darnley, and the Earl of Bothwell. We are particularly given great details about Darnley's death and hints about Mary's possible involvement in it. This Reader read that section and thought, "Why aren't we reading about that?"

I know, I know. Mary Queen of Scots has been done to death but come on this is Philippa Gregory. The Cousin's War and the Six Wives of Henry VIII aren't exactly big historical secrets. Plus, there are ways that Gregory could have told that story from a fresh perspective, perhaps from Darnley himself, or Bothwell, or even Mary's ladies in waiting (who were all named Mary incidentally). She could dip into historical mystery with "Who Killed Lord Darnley?" just as easily as she did with the mysteries of the Princes in the Tower and Amy Dudley. Instead this is a missed opportunity. (That missed opportunity continues into the next book, the chronological final volume in the series, The Other Queen. More on that later.)


Above all, this book carries a sense of lethargy throughout. I compare The Last Tudor to the last time we saw the end of a family, The King's Curse. The latter carried a sense of darkness and tragedy as though an era really was dying out. It's felt through the characters as one by one they are either executed or survive by getting with the program. In the case of The Last Tudor, that despair isn't near as emotional. Instead it is muted by several pages of inaction and dullness. At least Margaret Pole tried to fight her fate by screaming and running from the executioner. The only one who really shows any spunk to challenge her situation is Mary and at least she lives.

Instead the intrigue is more stale. The characters are more predictable. The conflicts are less interesting.

It is clear that Gregory wanted to end the series and was pretty much running on autopilot throughout. She was probably looking forward to writing the words, "The End" as much as Jane Grey was looking forward to being martyred.




The Last Tudor is not the worst way to nearly end a series, but it could be better. At most it's average. However, for a series, that is so superb that makes the average worse.


Thursday, February 20, 2020

New Book Alert: Off Telegraph: A Novel of Berkeley in the Sixties by Joseph V. Rodricks; A Long Strange Trip Into Science, Politics, Religion, and Fanaticism



New Book Alert: Off Telegraph: A Novel of Berkeley in the Sixties by Joseph V. Rodricks; A Long Strange Trip Into Science, Politics, Religion, and Fanaticism

By Julie Sara Porter

Bookworm Reviews




Spoilers: Of course a novel about the late 1960's would be set at Berkeley. Where else but Hippie Central would you find so many students and professors experimenting, protesting, exploring, tuning in, turning on, and dropping out?

Joseph V Rodricks' novel Off Telegraph: A Novel of Berkeley in the Sixties explores that groovy time with a colorful cast of characters that pursue knowledge in science, religion, politics, and some get very lost in the pursuit of that knowledge.



Grad student, Will Getz is studying to make a pfaffidine synthesis for a reliable source of pffafadine. He has spent several months working on the project and has only achieved positive results once by accident. He can't replicate the feat and time is ticking with a fearsome deadline soon approaching. Rather than admit the stall, Will changes the data information. This deception haunts Will especially as his opportunistic colleagues get involved.

Meanwhile, Will's former girlfriend Gina Antinori, an anthropology student is become more involved in the sociopolitical structure of the 1960's. She considers switching her major to Law and makes a bevvy of eccentric friends including Chris, a former priest who is considering break a few of his vows with Gina, Kay, a journalist exploring lesbianism, and Schaefer, an anthropology professor whose outlook on the world heads dangerously towards fanaticism.


The book is rich with characters driven by their goals to help society in their own ways. But their goals become lost because of ego trips and narrow perspectives that cause them to commit fraud even violence to achieve those goals.

Will is particularly hit by this. As anyone who has spent time in academia knows, plagiarism and fradulent research are not looked on very favorably in that circle. (Or in any circle for that matter, nor should they be.) If caught the person is subjected to expulsion, lost funding, lost position, denial of a degree, and given a black mark towards any future hiring possibilities among other things. That's why most college courses begin with the professor lecturing their students about the penalties. It's no wonder why this deceit continues to trouble Will.

Will was fascinated by studying chemistry and biology and using pffafadine to create better treatments for cancer patients. He, as many researchers often are, is swept up in the glory of achieving an unattainable goal and the fame and prestige that goes with it. However, Will becomes consumed with guilt for changing the data. He alienates himself from close friends and is easily swayed to commit more fraud to cover up his initial fraud. He becomes depressed and agitated and starts experimenting with hallucinogens to cope with the inner stress.


Gina and her colleagues also strive to change things in different ways. They want to end the Vietnam War, achieve equal rights for all, and explore life beyond their comfort zones. Many of them experiment by exchanging lovers and discovering about themselves. Gina's relationship with Chris is one that is between two souls that want to explore the world in a larger context beyond their rigid Catholic beliefs.

Their relationship is almost a union of the body and Spirit. They seem to reject the orthodox Catholicism with their physical union. However, the relationship intensifies Gina's inner spirit and she is able to become more active within the world around her.


Violence is also explored in how people's ideals can metamorphosis into fanaticism. One intense subplot has Schaefer leading some grad students to Guatemala in the middle of a civil war. When they return things take a turn into the horrific as Schaefer takes his religious intolerance to violent disturbing levels.

In one graphic passage a former colleague of Schaefer's explains what the man's plans were when he returned to California. Schaefer is driven by his own charisma, fanatic views, and ability to lead others as a cult leader. He has the idea that only his way is the purest and that society is so flawed, that he must bring about its destruction.


Off Telegraph explores the highs and lows of the 1960's. It was a time when everything was new and just waiting to be explored, fought for, experimented upon, challenged, and questioned. It was a time of great ideals. However, under those ideals was a darkness that bred corruption, illness, violence, and death. For better and for worse we were marked by that time.